Clinell 伽玛医用葡萄糖酸洗必泰棉片

伽玛

Clinell 伽玛医用葡萄糖酸洗必泰棉片销往全球50多个国家，一次性即用型湿巾的使用既能减少浪费，也降低了传统消毒方式带来的感染风险。

更快速
消毒速度比聚维酮碘起效快(1)。
更有效
与70%酒精、10%聚维酮碘和洗必泰水溶液比较，更有效降低中心静脉和动脉导管相关感染(2，3，4，5，6)。
杀菌谱广
杀菌谱广，特别适用于皮肤消毒(8)。
抗干扰
与传统碘消毒剂相比，在有血液、血清、和其他富含蛋白质物质的干扰下，依然保持很好的杀菌活性9。
更持久
与各种碘消毒剂相比，抑菌更持久1，最长可达48小时(7)。
低刺激性
葡萄糖酸洗必泰刺激性低，安全性高(8)。

参考文献
1.Larson E. Guideline for use of topical antimicrobial agents. American Journal of Infection Control 1988; 16(6):253-261.
2.Casey et al. A comparison of the efficacy of 70% v/v isopropyl alcohol with either 0.5% w/v or 2% w/v chlorhexidine gluconate for skin preparation before harvest of the long saphenous vein used.
3.in coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Infect Control. 2015 Aug;43(8):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 May 13.
4.Small et al. Efficacy of adding 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine gluconate to 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to peripheral venous cannulation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29(10):963-5.
5.Chaiyakunapruk N et al. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med.2002; 136:792 –801.
6.Adler, M., Brigger, K., Bishop, K., Mastrobattista, J. Comparison of bactericidal properties of alcohol-based chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine prior to amniocentesis. Am J Perinatol.
7.June 2012, 29(6):455–458.
8.Adams D et al. Evaluation of a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70%      isopropyl alcohol skin disinfectant. J Hosp Infect. 2005 Dec;61(4): 287-90. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
9.Rutala, W.A., D.J. Weber, and Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Editor 2008: Atlanta, GA.


使用方法

snxmm77

新产品，期待更多医院运用到。

沈艳梨

新产品，我们还没用到。

田田~

导管接头维护的好东东