找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1313|回复: 0

酒精擦手液的每次推荐用量足够有效杀灭细菌吗?

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-6-6 22:39 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 36, Issue 5, June 2008, Pages 356-360

Major article
How effective are hand antiseptics for the postcontamination treatment of hands when used as recommended?
酒精擦手液的每次推荐用量足够有效杀灭细菌吗?
Günter Kampf MD, a,

aBODE Chemie GmbH & Co KG, Scientific Affairs, Hamburg, Germany and Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany


Available online 5 June 2008.

Background
Alcohol-based hand antiseptics are often tested using 3 or 5 mL per application, but smaller volumes are likely to be applied in clinical practice. For that reason, we investigated the efficacy of 2 different volumes of 4 marketed hand rubs when applied to contaminated hands.

Methods
Hands of 16 volunteers were contaminated with Serratia marcescens. Hand rub A (85% ethanol), hand rub B (60% ethanol), hand rub C (62% ethanol), and hand rub D (61% ethanol) were applied as blinded formulations, each in single applications of 2.4 or 3.6 mL. Hibiclens (4% chlorhexidine gluconate) served as the reference treatment. Each hand rub was rubbed into the hands until dry. Preintervention and postintervention bacterial populations were obtained by the glove juice method. Neutralization of residual activity was validated.

Results
A 2.4-mL aliquot of a hand rub product was sufficient to cover both hands in 96.9% of the subjects. Applied in that volume, hand rubs produced a log10-reduction in bacterial populations of 2.79 for hand rub A, 2.26 for hand rub C, 1.96 for hand rub D, and 1.90 for hand rub B. Application of 3.6 mL was significantly more effective for hand rubs B, C, and D. The reference treatment reduced test bacteria by 2.39 log10. Analysis of variance revealed that both the type of hand rub and the applied volume had a highly significant influence on the mean log10 reduction on artificially contaminated hands (P < .001).

Conclusions
Hand rubs applied in amounts sufficient to cover both hands may not reduce the bacterial density by even 2 log10 steps. Based on our findings, the general trend toward alcohol-based hand rubs should not overlook evidence of significant differences in efficacy that appear to be related primarily to a product's overall concentration of alcohol.
贡献排行榜:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

×本站发帖友情提示
1、注册用户在本社区发表、转载的任何作品仅代表其个人观点,不代表本社区认同其观点。
2、如果存在违反国家相关法律、法规、条例的行为,我们有权在不经作者准许的情况下删除其在本论坛所发表的文章、帖子。
3、所有网友不要盗用有明确版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、本社区保护注册用户个人资料,但是在自身原因导致个人资料泄露、丢失、被盗或篡改,本论坛概不负责,也不承担相应法律责任。

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表