找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1423|回复: 4

英国和丹麦牛奶中发现“超级细菌”新变种

  [复制链接]
发表于 2011-6-4 21:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
本帖最后由 majiarui 于 2011-6-4 21:44 编辑

国际在线专稿:据澳大利亚《每日电讯报》6月3日报道,英国剑桥大学的科学家日前公布的最新研究结果表明,英国和丹麦牛奶中存在一种“超级细菌”的新变种,目前已经出现人类感染病例。尽管这种抗药细菌不太可能通过奶制品传播,但是与奶牛接触的工人有被感染的危险。

剑桥大学兽医学高级讲师马克·霍尔莫斯(Mark Holmes)发表在英国《柳叶刀》医学杂志上的研究成果显示,这种此前从未见过的细菌会对公众健康造成潜在威胁。虽然因为奶制品一般都消过毒,这种细菌通过食品传播的可能性不大,但那些与奶牛接触的工人却可能被感染。

这种细菌属于被称为“超级细菌”的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的最新变种。MRSA被媒体称为“食肉菌”,它能够通过感染人体上的伤口致人死命,对全球的医疗机构来讲都是一种重大的威胁。

霍尔莫斯称,最令人担心的是,这种MRSA的新变种不能用传统遗传检测方式化验出来,可能导致病人被用错抗生素。霍尔莫斯的同事劳拉·埃尔瓦雷兹(Laura Garcia-Alvarez)说,奶牛场工人感染这种新细菌的可能性最高,但现在他们还不清楚这种细菌是否具有高危感染性。他们是在研究奶牛乳腺炎的时候,意外发现这种新细菌的。

研究人员对正在医院接受MRSA感染治疗的病人进行检查后发现,已经有感染这种MRSA新变种的病例,其中苏格兰12例,英格兰15例,丹麦24例。(沈姝华)


http://news.163.com/11/0603/15/75KQ2LSM00014JB5.html

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-6-4 22:51 | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# majiarui


    恩,我去查下发表的英文文献
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-6-4 23:07 | 显示全部楼层
怕什么来什么,大量抗生素在动物上应用产生的后果会越来越严重了
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-6-5 20:28 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 蓝鱼o_0 于 2011-6-5 20:43 编辑

回复 1# majiarui

找到这篇英文报道了:
Researchers have discovered a new strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a mecA homologue that is genetically different compared with existing strains, in both human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark.

Standard molecular tests failed to identify the strain, therefore new diagnostic guidelines for the detection of MRSA should consider tests for the mecALGA251 gene, according to data presented at a press conference in advance of publication in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

“The test that we use at the moment to confirm MRSA will be falsely negative if we don’t take into account the new mecA gene,” Mark A. Holmes, PhD, of the department of veterinary medicine at the University of Cambridge, said during the press conference. “We are concerned that there is circumstantial evidence that MRSA is moving between cattle and people. The new MRSA is found in strains or family types of S. aureus that previously were only thought to exist within cows.”

In 2007, Holmes and colleagues identified a pair of isolates (strains LGA251 and LGA254) resistant to methicillin-like drugs in milk from dairy cows and set out to determine the cause of resistance in the bacteria. The researchers tested for mecA, the methicillin-resistant gene, using the standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Compared with PCR test results, which yielded negative results for methicillin resistance, whole genome sequencing revealed that there was, in fact, a mecA gene, a homologue with only 60% similarity to the conventional mecA gene.

Subsequently, the researchers searched for human MRSA isolates, and similar families in both cows and people in different parts of the countries were found with this strain, suggesting geographical clustering.

Approximately 51 isolates tested positive for mecA; 15 of 26 from England; 12 of 16 from Scotland; and 24 of 32 from Denmark. Further, after assessing trends in annual incidence of mecA detection, the researchers found that rates of these MRSA increased substantially between 2007 and 2010.

“The discovery of this new mecA homologue raises issues about the detection and confirmation of MRSA,” according to the researchers. “Irrespective of whether an infection is caused by mecALGA251 MRSA or conventional MRSA, after culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, appropriate decisions about care of patients can be made. However, when existing PCR or monoclonal antibody methods are used as the only method to detect MRSA, or when these methods are used to confirm provisional detection of MRSA, then mecALGA251 S. aureus will be wrongly diagnosed as methicillin-susceptible.”

Although the discovery of this previously undetected mecA homologue is of public health importance, Holmes said drinking milk and consuming dairy products is not a public health concern.

“There is no survival of MRSA in milk or dairy products, as long as the milk is pasteurized,” he said. “The main worry would be that these cows represent a pool of the bacteria, that these bacteria end up colonizing people who work or live on farms and they take it out to the wider community.”

The researchers said the ramifications of not detecting S. aureus strains that carry this new strain should be considered in diagnostic protocols.

Disclosure: This research was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Isaac Newton Trust (University of Cambridge), and the Wellcome Trust.

会议上发表了,正式全文还没有出来。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-5 22:58 | 显示全部楼层
回复 4# 蓝鱼o_0


    感谢蓝鱼版主的及时奉献与分享,谢谢。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表