本帖最后由 Adler007 于 2011-3-25 15:40 编辑
Etiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Increased Microbiological Yield with New Diagnostic Methods
Background. The microbial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still not well characterized. During the past few years, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based methods have been developed for many pathogens causing respiratory tract infections. The aim of this study was to determine the etiology of CAP among adults—especially the occurrence of mixed infections among patients with CAP—by implementing a newdiagnostic PCR platform combined with conventional methods.
Methods. Adults admitted to Karolinska University Hospital were studied prospectively during a 12-month period. Microbiological testing methods included culture from blood, sputum, and nasopharyngeal secretion samples; sputum samples analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis; nasopharyngeal specimens analyzed by use of PCR; serological testing for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and viruses common in the respiratory tract; and urine antigen assays for detection of pneumococcal and Legionella pneumophila antigens.
Results. A microbial etiology could be identified for 67% of the patients (np124). For patients with complete sampling, a microbiological agent was identified for 89% of the cases. The most frequently detected pathogens were S. pneumoniae (70 patients [38%]) and respiratory virus (53 patients [29%]). Two or more pathogens were present in 43 (35%) of 124 cases with a determined etiology.
Conclusions. By supplementing traditional diagnostic methods with new PCR-based methods, a high microbial yield was achieved. This was especially evident for patients with complete sampling. Mixed infections were frequent (most commonly S. pneumoniae together with a respiratory virus). 社区获得性肺炎的病原学:在微生物学领域中逐渐增多的新的鉴别方法 背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的微生物病原学仍然被不能很好地鉴别。过去这些年,对于许会导致呼吸道感染的病原体方面,以聚合酶链反应(PCR)为基础的方法相当成熟。本研究的目的是用一种新型PCR平板联合传统的方法以确定尤其在成年人中的发生混合性感染的社区获得性肺炎的病因
方法:在12个月期间,来自Karolinska大学附属医院的成年患者作为前瞻性研究对象。微生物检测方法包括培养血、痰及鼻咽部的分泌物,而且分析痰样本是采用PCR定量技术来鉴别肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和莫拉氏菌;鼻咽部分泌物标本分析依靠PCR的应用。肺炎支原体血标本的分析,常常处在呼吸道中的肺炎支原体和病毒分析是血标本,尿液抗原检测是为了检测肺炎球菌和军团菌肺炎菌抗原 结果: 67%的患者(124例)能够被检出微生物病原菌。对于取得完整标本的患者来说,89%患者可以用一种微生物制剂鉴定。通常检验出的病原菌是肺炎链球菌(70例患者(38%])和呼吸道病毒(53例(29%)。研究确定43(35%)患者(124例)可以鉴定出有两种或两种以上的病原菌。结论:在微生物学领域中取得了一种通过以传统鉴别方法为补充的新型PCR为基础的鉴别方法。这种方法取决于能否取得患者完整的标本。混合性感染常常是(通常情况下,肺炎链球菌感染者伴随者一种呼吸道病毒)。 |