找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1526|回复: 1

含酒精类手消毒剂去除艰难梭菌效果

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-5-4 12:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
本帖最后由 潮水 于 2010-5-4 12:47 编辑

Effectiveness of Alcohol‐Based Hand Rubs for Removal of Clostridium difficile Spores from Hands
美国感染控制与流行病学杂志2010年第6期
Background.Alcohol‐based hand rubs (ABHRs) are an effective means of decreasing the transmission of bacterial pathogens. Alcohol is not effective against Clostridium difficile spores. We examined the retention of C. difficile spores on the hands of volunteers after ABHR use and the subsequent transfer of these spores through physical contact.

Methods.Nontoxigenic C. difficile spores were spread on the bare palms of 10 volunteers. Use of 3 ABHRs and chlorhexidine soap–and‐water washing were compared with plain water rubbing alone for removal of C. difficile spores. Palmar cultures were performed before and after hand decontamination by means of a plate stamping method. Transferability of C. difficile after application of ABHR was tested by having each volunteer shake hands with an uninoculated volunteer.

Results.Plain water rubbing reduced palmar culture counts by a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) of 1.57 ± 0.11 log10 colony‐forming units (CFU) per cm2, and this value was set as the zero point for the other products. Compared with water washing, chlorhexidine soap washing reduced spore counts by a mean (±SD) of 0.89 ± 0.34 log10 CFU per cm2; among the ABHRs, Isagel accounted for a reduction of 0.11 ± 0.20 log10 CFU per cm2 (P=0.005 ), Endure for a reduction of 0.37 ± 0.42 log10 CFU per cm2 ( P=0.010), and Purell for a reduction of 0.14 ± 0.33 log10 CFU per cm2 (P=0.005 ). There were no statistically significant differences between the reductions achieved by the ABHRs; only Endure had a reduction statistically different from that for water control rubbing ( P=0.040). After ABHR use, handshaking transferred a mean of 30% of the residual C. difficile spores to the hands of recipients.

Conclusions.Hand washing with soap and water is significantly more effective at removing C. difficile spores from the hands of volunteers than are ABHRs. Residual spores are readily transferred by a handshake after use of ABHR.
贡献排行榜:
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-4 12:28 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusions.Hand washing with soap and water is significantly more effective at removing C. difficile spores from the hands of volunteers than are ABHRs.
在去除艰难梭菌方面用肥皂和水洗手比用含酒精类消毒剂效果更好。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

×本站发帖友情提示
1、注册用户在本社区发表、转载的任何作品仅代表其个人观点,不代表本社区认同其观点。
2、如果存在违反国家相关法律、法规、条例的行为,我们有权在不经作者准许的情况下删除其在本论坛所发表的文章、帖子。
3、所有网友不要盗用有明确版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、本社区保护注册用户个人资料,但是在自身原因导致个人资料泄露、丢失、被盗或篡改,本论坛概不负责,也不承担相应法律责任。

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表