本帖最后由 潮水 于 2010-1-30 17:18 编辑
1。Wristwatch use and hospital-acquired infection手表使用与医院感染(已翻译)
Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 74, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 16-21
Summary
The wrists and hands of hospital-based healthcare workers (HCWs) were sampled for bacterial contamination in two consecutive cross-sectional cohort studies of wristwatch wearers and non-wristwatch wearers. In the first study (N = 100), wrists were sampled by skin swabs and hands by direct plate inoculation. In the second study (N = 155) wrists were sampled after each HCW removed the watch immediately prior to sampling. Staphylococcus aureus was found on the hands of 25% of wristwatch wearers and 22.9% of non-wristwatch wearers in the first study. Watch wearers had higher counts of bacteria on their wrist (P < 0.001) but not on their hands. In the second study, removal of the watch prior to sampling resulted in increased counts of bacteria on both hands as well as on the watch wrist compared with non-watch wearers (P < 0.001). In conclusion, wearing a wristwatch results in an increase in bacterial contamination of the wrist but excess hand contamination does not occur unless the watch is manipulated.
Keywords: Hand hygiene; Infection control; Wristwatch
2。Can changes in clinical attire reduce likelihood of cross-infection without jeopardising the doctor–patient relationship?
在不影响医患关系的情况下医院改变白大衣能减少交叉感染率吗?(已翻译)
Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 74, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 22-29Summary
Research has shown that healthcare workers' clothes can become contaminated with pathogens. This study aimed to determine whether hospital doctors can change their attire to reduce the possibility of cross-infection without jeopardising the doctor–patient relationship. In this experimental repeated-measures study, 55 male and 45 female inpatients (mean age: 52.89 years) were randomly selected. Participants were shown photographs of medical dresscodes and asked to rate their appropriateness on a 5-point Likert scale. They were then read a standardised statement regarding the significance of attire to cross-infection and the exercise was repeated. Pre statement, there was no significant difference between the majority of dress options, though casual dress (male and female) and short-sleeved top (female) were considered significantly less appropriate. Post statement, surgical ‘scrubs’ and short-sleeved top/shirt were deemed most appropriate (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between short-sleeved shirt and scrubs for males. For females, scrubs were preferred (P = 0.0005). Participants expressed no significant preference for medical attire, with the exception of a dislike of casual dress. However, once informed of the significance of attire to cross-infection, preference changes to favour dresscodes which may minimise infection risk.
Keywords: Attire; Clothing; Cross-infection; Doctor–patient relationship
3。Patients' perspectives on how doctors dress病人对医生穿着的评价(已翻译)
Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 74, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 30-34
Summary
Infection in hospitals is a serious problem. Attempting to address the spread of infection, many UK National Health Service trusts have adopted a ‘bare-below-the-elbows’ and tie-less dress-code policy. This followed publication of Department of Health guidelines on staff uniforms in September 2007. Although the potential for colonisation of clothing with pathogens has been investigated, patients' opinions on dress-code and policy change have not. This survey of 75 patients in Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK, used questionnaires to address this. The survey showed that, although patients did feel that doctors' dress was important, neckties and white coats were not expected. Moreover, surgical scrubs were considered acceptable forms of attire. Problems of identifying doctors and determining their grade were repeatedly raised. Patients were generally unaware of the new dress-code, and few knew anything of its relationship to infection control. This work demonstrates that more ‘traditional’ dress is not expected. Given the problems of identification and perception of surgical scrubs as suitable, their introduction as a ‘uniform for doctors’ should be considered. Furthermore, work needs to be done to advertise policy change and increase patient awareness of infection control.
Keywords: Bare-below-the-elbows; Dress-code; Infection control
4 Universal screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: interim results from the NHS Scotland pathfinder projectMRSA普查-苏格兰NHS项目初步结果
Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 74, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 35-41Summary
Following recommendations from a Health Technology Assessment (HTA), a prospective cohort study of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening of all admissions (N = 29 690) to six acute hospitals in three regions in Scotland indicated that 7.5% of patients were colonised on admission to hospital. Factors associated with colonisation included re-admission, specialty of admission (highest in nephrology, care of the elderly, dermatology and vascular surgery), increasing age, and the source of admission (care home or other hospital). Three percent of all those who were identified as colonised developed hospital-associated MRSA infection, compared with only 0.1% of those not colonised. Specialties with a high rate of colonisation on admission also had higher rates of MRSA infection. Very few patients refused screening (11 patients, 0.03%) or had treatment deferred (14 patients, 0.05%). Several organisational issues were identified, including difficulties in achieving complete uptake of screening (88%) or decolonisation (41%); the latter was largely due to short duration of stay and turnaround time for test results. Patient movement resulted in a decision to decolonise all positive patients rather than just those in high risk specialties as proposed by the HTA. Issues also included a lack of isolation facilities to manage patients with MRSA. The study raises significant concerns about the contribution of decolonisation to reducing risks in hospital due to short duration of stay, and reinforces the central role of infection control precautions. Further study is required before the HTA model can be re-run and conclusions redrawn on the cost and clinical effectiveness of universal MRSA screening.
Keywords: Hospital-acquired infection; Infection control; Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Universal screening
5Healthcare-associated infection and the patient experience: a qualitative study using patient interviews 医源性感染与病人经历:一项病人访谈定性研究(已翻译)
Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 74, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 42-47
Summary
There is an increasing emphasis on the need for further patient involvement within healthcare to ensure that the voice of the patient is heard. This exploratory study utilised in-depth face-to-face interviews with patients to explore narratives from their experiences around healthcare-associated infection (HCAI). Interviews were undertaken with patients who had been diagnosed with a Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and patients who had been in the same hospital but had not been diagnosed with a bloodstream infection. The lack of both verbal and written communications was a major concern for most patients regardless of their infection status. Some patients also stated that they were not comfortable about asking questions, and only a small number of patients and relatives stated that they would challenge staff about their practice. Although some patients retained confidence in the National Health Service (NHS), the majority had very little or no confidence in the NHS in relation to HCAI and would have serious concerns about this if they were to return to hospital. The results suggest that there are a number of issues that must be addressed in order to enhance the quality of care, safety of patients and the patient experience in relation to infection prevention and control. In addition, policy-makers, managers and all healthcare workers must ensure that patients are involved in the design and evaluation of systems change and information.
Keywords: Communication; Healthcare-associated infection; Infection control; Interviews; Patient experience |