马上注册登录，享用更多感控资源，助你轻松入门。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册
|
×
Evaluation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
Background(#br)There are limited controlled data demonstrating contact precautions (CPs) prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections in endemic settings. We evaluated changes in hospital-acquired MRSA and VRE infections after discontinuing CPs for these organisms.(#br)Methods(#br)This is a retrospective study done at an 800-bed teaching hospital in urban Detroit. CPs for MRSA and VRE were discontinued hospital-wide in 2013. Data on MRSA and VRE catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), surgical site infections (SSIs), and hospital-acquired MRSA bacteremia (HA-MRSAB) rates were compared before and after CPs discontinuation.(#br)Results(#br)There were 36,907 and 40,439 patients hospitalized during the two 12-month periods: CPs and no CPs. Infection rates in the CPs and no-CPs periods were as follows: (1) MRSA infections: VAP, 0.13 versus 0.11 ( P = .84); CLABSI, 0.11 versus 0.19 ( P = .45); SSI, 0 versus 0.14 ( P = .50); and CAUTI, 0.025 versus 0.033 ( P = .84); (2) VRE infections: CAUTI, 0.27 versus 0.13 ( P = .19) and CLABSI, 0.29 versus 0.3 ( P = .94); and (3) HA-MRSAB rates: 0.14 versus 0.11 ( P = .55), respectively.(#br)Conclusions(#br)Discontinuation of CPs did not adversely impact endemic MRSA and VRE infection rates.
| 
#AI工具#
上传视频拿金币，快来上传你最喜爱的感控相关视频吧！#👈点我了解详情#
发表于 2018-3-20 11:15
发表于 2018-3-20 14:34
