找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 2177|回复: 8

prion是一种病毒还是感染性蛋白?是翻译为朊毒体还是朊病毒?

 火.. [复制链接]
发表于 2012-11-4 16:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease克雅氏病

[size=0.9em]Fact sheet N°180
Revised February 2012


Epidemiology
Before the identification of vCJD, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), the most common of the known human TSEs, was thought to exist in only three forms:


  • sporadic CJD, which occurs throughout the world at the rate of about one per million people, and accounts for about 85% of CJD cases;
  • familial CJD, which is associated with a gene mutation and makes up 5–15% of CJD cases; and
  • iatrogenic CJD, which results from accidental transmission via contaminated surgical equipment or as a result of corneal or meningeal (dura mater) transplants or the administration of human-derived pituitary growth hormones; this accounts for less than 5% of CJD cases.
In contrast to the traditional forms of CJD, vCJD has affected younger patients (median age at death of 28 years, as opposed to 68 years) and has a relatively longer duration of illness (median of 14 months as opposed to 4.5 months).
The first person to develop symptoms of what turned out to be vCJD became ill in 1994. Most people who have developed vCJD lived in the United Kingdom. Some cases that were diagnosed in countries other than the United Kingdom occurred in people who were probably exposed to the BSE while residing in the United Kingdom.
As of early May 2011, the CJD surveillance unit for the United Kingdom reported 172 primary cases of vCJD, and three secondary cases of vCJD related to blood transfusion. Among primary cases, there are four additional cases in the United Kingdom and one in Canada where vCJD is strongly suspected, but the diagnosis has not yet been definitively confirmed by post mortem analysis.
Probable cause
The nature of the vCJD agent is being investigated and is still a matter of debate. One prevalent theory is that the agent is composed largely, if not entirely, of a self-replicating misfolded protein, referred to as a prion.
There is strong scientific evidence that vCJD is linked with exposure to a TSE of cattle called BSE. The link between vCJD and BSE was first hypothesized because of the association of these two TSEs in time and place. In addition, laboratory evidence indicates that vCJD is linked causally with BSE.
Intensive surveillance in European countries has confirmed the high incidence of vCJD in the United Kingdom, the country with the largest potential exposure to BSE. Several cases in other countries were likely exposed to the BSE agent while residing in the United Kingdom.
The most likely cause of vCJD is exposure to the BSE agent through consumption of food from bovine origin most plausibly contaminated by infected bovine brain or other central nervous system tissue.
Only four cases of vCJD infection have been associated with blood transfusion: three of these cases developed symptoms of vCJD several years after transfusion, and one died from unrelated causes before developing symptoms of vCJD, but was shown to be infected with vCJD.
目前对于 prion,我国最新发布的《医疗机构消毒技术规范》翻译为朊病毒。但看目前WHO网站上仍然没有明确说prion是一种病毒,而是说一种流行的理论是,这种因子主要但不完整由一种可以自我复制的错误折叠的蛋白质组成,简称prion。(One prevalent theory is that the agent is composed largely, if not entirely, of a self-replicating misfolded protein, referred to as a prion.)究竟是不是一种病毒呢?还是一种感染性蛋白质?欢迎大家提供证据参与讨论!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-4 16:44 | 显示全部楼层
一次听课刚好有听到有关这方面内容,倪所明确指出,病毒是错的,因为没有DNA或RNA。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-4 16:53 | 显示全部楼层
得专家讲过,叫“朊毒体”,是一种带毒的蛋白质颗粒。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-4 23:07 | 显示全部楼层
我查阅了国内的万方数据库,发现两个名词出现的频率都比较高啊。说明国内这块还是比较混乱。但是采用“软病毒”这个概念的,似乎更多一些。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-4 23:58 | 显示全部楼层
期大家对PRION的认识曾经有过病毒的提法,但是后来应该认为是一种可以引起感染的变异蛋白,就像楼主所列举的文献中描述的,个人认为定义为病毒应该不恰当。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-5 08:01 | 显示全部楼层

建议做分层分析,好像以前翻译“阮病毒”多,目前是不是用“阮毒体”更多了呢?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-5 08:32 | 显示全部楼层
去通常将prion译为朊粒、朊毒体等。
通常病毒定义为含义单一核酸的微生物,而prion恰恰没有核酸只有蛋白质,所以有人认为这是一个与核酸病毒不同的生物因子,是一种蛋白质病毒,基于此,有人就称作为朊病毒。
我个人偏好译为朊毒体,毕竟朊病毒还是不太符合病毒的传统定义,与病毒也是有一定差异的。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-7 12:24 | 显示全部楼层
人认为翻译为朊毒体比较合适;朊病毒存在误导的嫌疑。
国内专家说法不一致,也没统一的说法。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-11-7 12:34 | 显示全部楼层
朊毒体,似乎这样的翻译更确切一些。也贴近临床。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表