2010年美国MRSA患病率

蓝鱼o_0

National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at United States health care facilities, 2010

William R. Jarvis, MD
• 
  

BackgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains one of the most prevalent multidrug-resistant organisms causing health care-associated infections. Limited data are available about how the prevalence of MRSA has changed over the past several years and what MRSA prevention practices have been implemented since the 2006 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc, MRSA survey.
MethodsWe conducted a national prevalence survey of MRSA colonization or infection in inpatients at US health care facilities. The survey was developed, received institutional review board approval, and then was distributed to all US Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc, members. Members were asked to complete the survey on 1 day during the period August 1 to December 30, 2010, reporting the number of inpatients with MRSA infection or colonization and facility- and patient-specific information.
ResultsPersonnel at 590 facilities indicated a state and responded to the survey. All states were represented, except for Alaska and Washington, DC (mean, 12 facilities per state; range, 1-38). Respondents reported 4,476 MRSA-colonized/infected patients in 67,412 inpatients; the overall MRSA prevalence rate was 66.4 per 1,000 inpatients (25.3 infections and 41.1 colonizations per 1,000 inpatients). Active surveillance testing was conducted by 75.7% of the respondents; 39.6% used nonselective media, 37.2% used selective media, and 23.3% used polymerase chain reaction. Detailed data were provided on 3,176 MRSA-colonized/infected patients. Of those in whom colonization/infection status was reported (1,908/3,086 [61.8%] were MRSA colonized and 1,778/3,086 [38.2%] were MRSA infected), most MRSA-colonized or infected patients (78.3%) were detected within 48 hours of admission; the most common site of infection was skin and soft tissue (42.9%); and, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s definitions, approximately 50% would be classified as health care-associated infections.
ConclusionOur survey documents that the MRSA prevalence in 2010 is higher than that reported in our 2006 survey. However, the majority of facilities currently are performing active surveillance testing, and, compared with 2006, the rate of MRSA infection has decreased while the rate of MRSA colonization has increased. In addition, compared with 2006, the proportion of MRSA strains recovered from MRSA-colonized/infected patients that are health care-associated strains has deceased, and community-associated strains have increased.

可以看到在美国现在大多数医院都开展主动监测培养了。HA-MRSA下降，而CA-MRSA上升。

sebastienkitty

恩，很新，今年四月的文献，目前还看不到免费的全文，顺便比较了下他们2006年的数据，可惜没有找到我国的大型调研数据

National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at US health care facilities, 2006.

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) being endemic in virtually all US health care facilities, there are no data on the prevalence of MRSA in US health care facilities.

METHODS: We conducted a national prevalence survey of MRSA in inpatients at US health care facilities. The survey was developed, received institutional review board approval, and then distributed to all members of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. (APIC). Members were asked to complete the survey on one day during the period October 1 to November 16, 2006, reporting the number of inpatients with MRSA infection or colonization and facility-specific information.

RESULTS: Personnel at 1237 hospitals completed the survey. Complete facility data were provided for 1187 (96%) of these health care facilities. All states were represented (mean, 23 facilities per state; range, 1-99). Respondents reported 8654 MRSA-colonized/infected patients in 187,058 inpatients; the overall MRSA prevalence rate was 46.3 per 1000 inpatients (34 infections and 12 colonizations per 1000 inpatients). Active MRSA surveillance testing was conducted by 29% of respondents: 54% used routine media, 38% used selective media, and 8% used polymerase chain reaction. Detailed data were provided on 7994 (92.4%) MRSA-colonized/infected patients. Our data suggest that approximately 70% of isolates were more consistent with health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) than community-associated MRSA.

CONCLUSION: Our survey documents a much higher MRSA prevalence rate than previous studies using different methodologies. The majority of MRSA in inpatients appears to be HA-MRSA. Given that most facilities did not perform active surveillance testing, these are minimum estimates of the national burden of MRSA in US health care facilities.