马上注册登录，享用更多感控资源，助你轻松入门。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册
|
×
Discrimination between epidemic and non-epidemic glycopeptide-resistant E. faecium in a post-outbreak situation Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 67, Issue 1, September 2007, Pages 49-55
Summary
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have been isolated in increasing numbers. Hospital-adapted VRE exhibit relatively high pathogenicity by expressing factors like enterococcal surface protein (Esp), which facilitates epidemic spread. By contrast, ‘community-acquired’ VRE show low pathogenicity and non-epidemic features. In 2004 and 2005 an extended outbreak of VRE occurred at a university hospital in Southwestern Germany and an infection control programme was implemented to confine the outbreak. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), esp PCR, multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), purK1 typing and multiple-locus sequence typing (MLST) were performed on representative VRE isolates. Twenty-six non-epidemic and two epidemic VRE types (MLST203, MLST280) were identified by PFGE. Seven of the non-outbreak VRE types were esp gene negative, whereas 19 non-outbreak and both epidemic VRE types were esp positive. Eight MLVA types were identified. MLVA type 1 included five PFGE types and MLVA type 159 included 16 PFGE types. Currently there is no efficient method available to identify non-epidemic VRE and avoid unnecessary isolation of patients. More than 50% non-epidemic clones were esp positive; nevertheless, esp PCR appears to be the most promising approach to identify non-epidemic VRE.
Keywords: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci; Endemic; Non-endemic; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; Multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis; Enterococcal surface protein |
发表于 2007-9-18 17:07
发表于 2007-9-20 15:45
发表于 2007-9-21 12:06