找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 2257|回复: 6

【专刊】压疮的治疗2013AIM(影响因子15 )

  [复制链接]
发表于 2013-7-7 11:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
文1:

Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention: A Systematic Comparative Effectiveness Review


Background: Pressure ulcers are associated with substantial health burdens but may be preventable.

Purpose: To review the clinical utility of pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments and the comparative effectiveness of preventive interventions in persons at higher risk.

Data Sources: MEDLINE (1946 through November 2012), CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, grant databases, clinical trial registries, and reference lists.

Study Selection: Randomized trials and observational studies on effects of using risk assessment on clinical outcomes and randomized trials of preventive interventions on clinical outcomes.

Data Extraction: Multiple investigators abstracted and checked study details and quality using predefined criteria.







0000605-201307020-00006.pdf (154.03 KB, 下载次数: 18)
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-7 11:11 | 显示全部楼层
文2:

Pressure Ulcer Treatment Strategies: A Systematic Comparative Effectiveness Review

Purpose: To summarize evidence comparing the effectiveness and safety of treatment strategies for adults with pressure ulcers.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Health Technology Assessment Database for English- or foreign-language studies; reference lists; gray literature; and individual product packets from manufacturers (January 1985 to October 2012).
Study Selection: Randomized trials and comparative observational studies of treatments for pressure ulcers in adults and noncomparative intervention series (n > 50) for surgical interventions and evaluation of harms.
Data Extraction: Data were extracted and evaluated for accuracy of the extraction, quality of included studies, and strength of evidence.
Data Synthesis: 174 studies met inclusion criteria and 92 evaluated complete wound healing. In comparison with standard care, placebo, or sham interventions, moderate-strength evidence showed that air-fluidized beds (5 studies [n = 908]; high consistency), protein-containing nutritional supplements (12 studies [n = 562]; high consistency), radiant heat dressings (4 studies [n = 160]; moderate consistency), and electrical stimulation (9 studies [n = 397]; moderate consistency) improved healing of pressure ulcers. Low-strength evidence showed that alternating-pressure surfaces, hydrocolloid dressings, platelet-derived growth factor, and light therapy improved healing of pressure ulcers. The evidence about harms was limited.
Limitation: Applicability of results is limited by study quality, heterogeneity in methods and outcomes, and inadequate duration to assess complete wound healing.
Conclusion: Moderate-strength evidence shows that healing of pressure ulcers in adults is improved with the use of air-fluidized beds, protein supplementation, radiant heat dressings, and electrical stimulation.
Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.




0000605-201307020-00007.pdf (230.27 KB, 下载次数: 2)
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-7-7 13:13 | 显示全部楼层
正需要这个资料,可惜,就是看不懂。谢谢!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-7-7 15:09 | 显示全部楼层
我和老师一样需要这个资料,可惜,就是看不懂。谢谢!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-7-8 08:49 | 显示全部楼层
我也非常需要这个资料,我一定争取把它们看懂!谢谢!
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-7-8 12:25 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表