找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1366|回复: 2

怎样才算干净?医院清洁评估的方法

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-11-23 14:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 70, Issue 4, December 2008, Pages 328-334

How clean is clean? Proposed methods for hospital cleaning assessment
怎样才算干净?医院清洁评估的方法
A. Al-Hamada, , and S. Maxwellb
aSchool of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
bDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK


Received 18 December 2007;  
accepted 1 August 2008.  
Available online 9 October 2008.


SummaryReducing infection rates in hospitals depends on a variety of factors, including environmental measures. Although microbiological standards have been proposed for surface hygiene in hospitals, standard methods for environmental sampling have not been discussed. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of cleaning/disinfection in critical care units using the wipe–rinse method to detect an indicator organism and dipslides to quantitatively determine the microbial load. Frequent-hand-touch surfaces from clinical and non-clinical areas were microbiologically surveyed, targeting both meticillin-susceptible (MSSA) and meticillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus. A subset of the surfaces targeted was sampled quantitatively to determine the total aerobic count. MRSA was isolated from 9 (6.9%) and MSSA was isolated from 15 (11.5%) of the 130 samples collected. Seven of 81 (8.6%) samples collected from non-clinical areas grew MRSA, compared with two (4.1%) from 49 samples collected from clinical areas. Of 116 sites screened for the total aerobic count, 9 (7.7%) showed >5 cfu/cm2 microbial growth. Bed frames, telephones and computer keyboards were among the surfaces that yielded a high total viable count. There was no direct correlation between the findings of total aerobic count and MRSA isolation. We suggest, however, that combining both standards will give a more effective method of assessing the efficacy of cleaning/disinfection strategy. Further work is required to evaluate and refine these standards in order to assess the frequency of cleaning required for a particular area, or for changing the protocol or materials used.

Keywords: Hospital cleaning; Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Surface hygiene; Surface sampling method

评分

参与人数 1 +10 收起 理由
楚楚 + 10 谢谢分享!

查看全部评分

贡献排行榜:
发表于 2008-11-23 19:34 | 显示全部楼层

回复 #1 David 的帖子

这篇文章从一个侧面反映了仅仅通过微生物定量指标评价环境卫生效果的局限性
有几处能否帮助翻译一下?谢谢:)
wipe-rinse method to detect the indicator organism and dipslides to quantitatively determine the microbial load.

high dependency unit(HDU)

Oie
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-11-27 22:10 | 显示全部楼层
urther work is required to evaluate and refine these standards in order to assess the frequency of cleaning required for a particular area, or for changing the protocol or materials used.
综合静态环境监测结合动态监测、合理医疗区、非诊疗区相结合采样并用更能指导清洁消毒频率方法范围,达到整真正清洁就是安全的。

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

×本站发帖友情提示
1、注册用户在本社区发表、转载的任何作品仅代表其个人观点,不代表本社区认同其观点。
2、如果存在违反国家相关法律、法规、条例的行为,我们有权在不经作者准许的情况下删除其在本论坛所发表的文章、帖子。
3、所有网友不要盗用有明确版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、本社区保护注册用户个人资料,但是在自身原因导致个人资料泄露、丢失、被盗或篡改,本论坛概不负责,也不承担相应法律责任。

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表