找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1914|回复: 11

频繁更换呼吸机管路能显著增加VAP发病风险!

 火.. [复制链接]
发表于 2013-4-23 10:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
Effect of Ventilator Circuit Changes on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines concerning prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia recommend
that ventilator circuits should not be changed routinely, but in practice circuit changes at
regular intervals persist. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases
and reviewed citations to identify articles that reported the results of randomized controlled
trials and sequential comparison studies that provided a clearly defined intervention of circuit
changes (interval > 2 d) and the outcome measure of the development of ventilator-associated
pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult patients. Both authors independently assessed the
validity of the included studies, and extracted data using a pre-designed data-collection form. We
used a random-effect model to combine data from studies that compared circuit changes every
2 days versus every 7 days, and circuit changes at regular intervals versus no routine circuit change.
RESULTS: The search yielded 10 reports, which included 19,169 patients. Compared to patients
exposed to circuit changes every 7 days, patients who received circuit changes every 2 days had a
higher risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (odds ratio 1.928, 95% confidence interval 1.080–
3.443). Compared to no routine circuit change, changing the ventilator circuit at a 2-day or 7-day
interval was associated with an odds ratio of 1.126 (95% confidence interval 0.793–1.599). There
was a trend of reduced risk of pneumonia as circuit-change intervals were extended. CONCLUSIONS:
Frequent ventilator circuit changes are associated with a high risk of ventilator-associated
pneumonia. No routine circuit change is safe and justified. Hospital infection-control policies and
bedside practitioners should translate the evidence into clinical practice, if they haven’t done so
already. Key words: meta-analysis; respiratory care; pneumonia; prevention; ventilator circuit. [Respir
Care 2010;55(4):467– 474. © 2010 Daedalus Enterprises]


467.full.pdf (299.19 KB, 下载次数: 18)
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-23 10:58 | 显示全部楼层
所有对象均为****。

研究显示,相对于7天更换呼吸机管路,2到3天换一次,可以显著增加VAP的风险!


change of MV.png
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-23 11:09 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢蓝鱼版主的英文文献翻译解读,又找到了更换呼吸机管路时间的循证依据。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-23 11:38 | 显示全部楼层
我们一直是每周更换,有污染及时更换,又得到循证依据,谢谢蓝鱼版。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-23 11:44 | 显示全部楼层
我们一直是每周更换。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-23 12:28 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-23 13:27 | 显示全部楼层
蓝鱼o_0 发表于 2013-4-23 12:28
指南推荐,再结合循证证据,就更容易理解啦!

谢谢老师,学习了.我院也是这样做的。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-23 14:02 | 显示全部楼层
歇息蓝鱼老师的翻译解读,学习了
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-23 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢老师推荐,循证的证据指导临床工作最可信
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-26 12:13 | 显示全部楼层

谢谢老师推荐,循证的证据指导临床工作最可信
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-4-26 13:00 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢蓝鱼版,我们一直是每周更换,遇污染及时更换的。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-11-22 10:35 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢楼主提出的新思路
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表