找回密码
 注册

微信登录,快人一步

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

公告区+ 发布

04-09 21:27
04-09 21:26
系统消息:qzygbln已经连续答对100道难题,逆天学霸谁与争锋?!#每日答题#
04-06 23:38
03-21 08:09
03-06 08:48
01-07 16:18
01-06 15:55
01-02 17:30
查看: 1740|回复: 2

有奖翻译:Cohorting based on nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus s

[复制链接]
发表于 2013-4-30 21:48 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

马上注册登录,享用更多感控资源,助你轻松入门。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册 |

×
最新一期AJIC文摘Background

Hospital roommates are cohorted with similarly colonized patients to decrease methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) transmission risk. However, little is known about differences in S aureus nasal and extranasal carriage between hospital roommates who are in MRSA or non-MRSA designated rooms.

Methods

Patients sharing hospital rooms were cultured for S aureus in the nose, throat, and other body sites. Differences in S aureusmethicillin and mupirocin susceptibility and USA300 type were evaluated.

Results

Eighty-two patients comprising 48 roommate pairs were studied. Among 6 roommate pairs in MRSA rooms, 3 (50%) had differences in carriage based on having methicillin-susceptible S aureus at an extranasal body site. In non-MRSA rooms, 19 (45%) roommate pairs had differences in S aureus carriage. Extranasal colonization was significantly associated with discordance between roommates, P < .001. Antibiotic exposure, ward type, and the duration of room sharing were not associated with discordance.

Conclusion

Patients have almost a 50% chance of having differences in S aureus colonization compared with their hospital roommate, even in MRSA-designated rooms. Cohorting by MRSA status at the time of admission may not be as effective a control strategy as horizontal measures that do not rely on known colonization with S aureus or other pathogens.


回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-5-2 23:10 | 显示全部楼层
能否给出全文?这篇文献很好,我想全文阅读,谢谢了。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2013-5-6 16:55 | 显示全部楼层
这篇文献确实很好!!!!
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表