蓝鱼o_0 发表于 2012-1-22 17:07

【推荐】2012柳叶刀报道:流感疫苗的效率效果-系统评价

The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Volume 12, Issue 1,Pages 36 - 44, January 2012
<Previous Article|Next Article>
doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70295-Xhttp://www.thelancet.com/images/clear.gifCite or Link Using DOI
Published Online: 26 October 2011
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysisOriginal Text
Prof Michael T Osterholm PhD a http://www.thelancet.com/images/article_notepad.gifhttp://www.thelancet.com/images/article_email.gif, Nicholas S Kelley PhD a, Prof Alfred Sommer MD b, Edward A Belongia MD c
SummaryBackgroundNo published meta-analyses have assessed efficacy and effectiveness of licensed influenza vaccines in the USA with sensitive and highly specific diagnostic tests to confirm influenza.

MethodsWe searched Medline for randomised controlled trials assessing a relative reduction in influenza risk of all circulating influenza viruses during individual seasons after vaccination (efficacy) and observational studies meeting inclusion criteria (effectiveness). Eligible articles were published between Jan 1, 1967, and Feb 15, 2011, and used RT-PCR or culture for confirmation of influenza. We excluded some studies on the basis of study design and vaccine characteristics. We estimated random-effects pooled efficacy for trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) when data were available for statistical analysis (eg, at least three studies that assessed comparable age groups).

FindingsWe screened 5707 articles and identified 31 eligible studies (17 randomised controlled trials and 14 observational studies). Efficacy of TIV was shown in eight (67%) of the 12 seasons analysed in ten randomised controlled trials (pooled efficacy 59% in adults aged 18—65 years). No such trials met inclusion criteria for children aged 2—17 years or adults aged 65 years or older. Efficacy of LAIV was shown in nine (75%) of the 12 seasons analysed in ten randomised controlled trials (pooled efficacy 83% ) in children aged 6 months to 7 years. No such trials met inclusion criteria for children aged 8—17 years. Vaccine effectiveness was variable for seasonal influenza: six (35%) of 17 analyses in nine studies showed significant protection against medically attended influenza in the outpatient or inpatient setting. Median monovalent pandemic H1N1 vaccine effectiveness in five observational studies was 69% (range 60—93).

InterpretationInfluenza vaccines can provide moderate protection against virologically confirmed influenza, but such protection is greatly reduced or absent in some seasons. Evidence for protection in adults aged 65 years or older is lacking. LAIVs consistently show highest efficacy in young children (aged 6 months to 7 years). New vaccines with improved clinical efficacy and effectiveness are needed to further reduce influenza-related morbidity and mortality.

FundingAlfred P Sloan Foundation.



细菌耐药 发表于 2012-1-23 02:55

Lancet上的最新报道,学习了,蓝鱼版主这种经常看文献的习惯,值得我们大家学习。

石磊--wxmsl 发表于 2012-1-24 00:16

敬业才会这样,值得学习!
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 【推荐】2012柳叶刀报道:流感疫苗的效率效果-系统评价